by Chris Marshall:
Well, the 1990s are finished. This decade in The Oscar
Project took place during a time of major change in my life. I watched the
first movie of the decade in somebody else’s apartment in Columbus, Ohio,
because my power was out, and I watched the last while lying in bed in
Smithville, Mississippi. It’s kind of hard to imagine that I wrote the first
post of this series two and a half months ago when I should have been paying
attention in my hierarchical linear modeling class at Ohio State.
It’s been quite a ride. When I first started in late April,
I’d seen 21/84 of the winners, or 25%. Now I’ve seen 80/84, or 95%. By Tuesday,
I will have seen every single one of them, which I bet very few people are able
to say. There have been some really bad movies, though not as many as I
expected, and some extremely good ones, many of which completely took me off
guard.
The 1990s, from top to bottom, was one of the finest decades
yet. The two films I dreaded most, Dances
with Wolves and The English Patient,
were pretty good and not as bad as I expected, respectively. The rest were all
high-quality as well; there was nothing at all that I hated, and I consider
that a real victory.
As always, ranking them from favorite to least favorite was
a difficult choice, mostly because I’m afraid a low ranking will be translated
as me not liking the movie. That’s really not the case, however. It’s not that
I love Caesar less but that I love Rome more.
That being said, here we go, my penultimate top 10 of the
decade.
- Unforgiven (1992)
- Schindler's List (1993)
- Forrest Gump (1994)
- The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
- Dances with Wolves (1990)
- American Beauty (1999)
- Titanic (1997)
- Braveheart (1995)
- Shakespeare in Love (1998)
- The English Patient (1996)
I’m still not entirely
convinced about some of these placements. Does Forrest Gump really
belong ahead of Silence of the Lambs? Do I actually enjoy American
Beauty more than Titanic? They’re virtual ties, but I went
with my typical tiebreaking procedure. If I had to watch one of them again right
now, which one would I pick?
I feel like a terrible
person for not putting Schindler’s List in
the top spot, but I was just so, so impressed by Unforgiven. It
seemed very nearly perfect, and while I do love Schindler’s List,
using my metric, Unforgiven comes out on top again. I’m really
excited about doing my rankings for all 84 winners in a couple of weeks. It’s
going to be a Herculean effort, but I think it’ll be a lot of fun.
Palance shows he's still got at the '92 ceremony |
I mentioned a couple of days ago that I was going to discuss
my post-Oscar Project plans in this interlude post. There are two major reasons
for this. The first is that it’s getting harder and harder to come up with
anything original to say in these, and the second is that I really do have a
couple of new plans, not that anybody’s been waiting on them with bated breath.
I’ve previously mentioned my intention to do a “director of
the week” column, in which I’d dedicate each week to a single director, and I’d
watch and write about five movies by that person that I hadn’t seen. As the
weeks have gone by, I’ve decided that’s a little too limiting. I’ll still do
that column, but I’ve also added a “genre of the week” and a “franchise of the
week.” There are some genres, particularly Westerns, where I’ve hardly seen anything. I really want to clear out
these blind spots. Similarly, with the franchises, I’m tired of telling people,
for example, that I’ve only seen one James Bond movie or that I’ve never seen Nightmare on Elm Street. With these
posts, I won’t have that problem anymore!
I know that seems like a major undertaking, but that’s the
plan. The Oscar Project only had about a three month lifespan, but I want this
blog to have a long lifespan. I may not be posting daily anymore, but this will
give me incentive to keep writing on at least
a weekly basis, as well as freeing up more time to write about non-movie
topics.
The final Oscar Project review post will appear on Monday,
July 23, and after a couple of days of retrospective posts, it’ll be time to
retire it. But there’s a brave new world out there, folks. We’ll move on to
bigger and better (maybe not better) things.
No comments:
Post a Comment