by Chris Marshall:
“It has arrived at last, and we cannot get over the shock of
not being disappointed; we had almost been looking forward to that.”
Frank S. Nugent wrote those words in his 1939 New York Times
review of Gone with the Wind, and 73
years later, I felt exactly the same way. It’s the first of the Oscar winners
with a serious reputation, and it’s one of the most famous movies ever made.
But it is also a period piece and clocks in just shy of four hours long. I
thought there was no way it could live up to the hype.
But it did. I was captivated the whole way through. It had
the scope and feel of a true epic, and at no point did I feel like it was
dragging along. That’s quite a feat for the longest Best Picture winner in the
history of the award.
The problem that I face while writing this post is that
there is nothing left to say about this movie that hasn’t been said a thousand
times before. It’s a masterpiece, of course, and the performances are
outstanding. Perhaps I can only say this in retrospect, but it’s impossible to
imagine anybody else being Scarlett O’Hara or Rhett Butler or any of the
others.
Gone with the Wind
is sometimes criticized for painting an idyllic portrait of the antebellum
South. There is some validity to this idea; the “good times” took place during
a time when slavery was still legal, after all. I disagree with this line of argument,
however. It assumes that the views of the film are the same as the views of the
filmmaker, and I don’t at all think this is the case. The views of the film are
those of the characters, Scarlett in particular. Just because she pines for the
long-lost days of slavery doesn’t mean that the director, or the screenwriter,
or Margaret Mitchell herself believes that’s the way it should be.
It's a surprisingly violent movie, too. |
Scarlett is a deeply complex, deeply troubled character. One
of the strengths of the movie is that she is never portrayed either as a hero
or a villain. She’s just a person, and like everybody else, she has moments of
triumph and defeat. Her ideas, thoughts, and beliefs belong to her and her
alone. That’s the nice thing about having a four hour long movie. You have time
to develop characters in great detail without relying on clichés or shortcuts.
GWTW is a tremendously well-made film in every respect.
Plotting, pacing, characterization, acting, cinematography, you name it. It had
a massive budget, and the studio spared no expense in its production. The crane
shot around the halfway point of the film, after Atlanta has been taken by
Union forces, is a thing of beauty, one of the most famous shots in the annals
of cinema. Indeed, there were so many iconic moments to be seen. Before last
week, I had seen maybe five minutes of the movie in my life, and yet everything
seemed so familiar.
Fresh victims for the ever-growing army of the undead. |
What else is there to say, really? Like me, you already know
everything about the movie. If you’ve seen it, you know how great it is
(anybody who says otherwise is just trolling). Anything else I write will just
add to the chorus, and who has time for that?
And so ends the 1930s. It was fun while it lasted, but it’s
time to move on. After all, tomorrow is another movie.
So glad you enjoyed it! I finally watched it last summer and loved it! I'm toying with reading the novel, but we'll see how that goes.
ReplyDelete